Traits |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
Title |
Title is perfect for the piece and beckons the reader. |
The title fits the poem and intrigues the reader. |
The title is somewhat appropriate to the overall effect of the poem. |
The title does not fit the overall effect of the poem. |
Content |
The poem clearly and concisely develops a purposeful idea and paints a picture. |
The poem clearly develops an idea that is meaningful. |
The poem begins to tell a story to the reader, but more detail is needed. |
The
poem does not tell a story the reader can relate to/understand. |
Organization |
The writer communicates in a complete, compelling manner. Transitions enhance the overall order. |
The writer tells things in an order that makes sense and keeps the reader's interest. Transitions are evident. |
The poem has promise. In some places it moves along nicely, but in other places it seems bogged down. |
The
poem does not flow; the writer tells things in an order that leaves the reader confused. |
Tone |
The poem has a life of its own. The writer's individual voice is heard in every word. |
The poem has personality. The writer's individual voice is heard frequently. |
The poet is beginning to share with the reader his true feelings, but more emotion is needed. |
The poem does not show how the writer feels, so the reader has difficulty relating to the poet. |
Poetic Devices/ Creativity |
The writer uses vivid imagery: with at least one example of onomatopoeia and personification to paint a picture in
the reader's mind. Highly imaginative; poet is clearly expanding his own boundaries |
The writer often uses imagery to paint a picture in the reader's mind. Unique; evidence of risk-taking. |
The writer is beginning to show promise by using vivid words and some attempts at literary devices. Some experimentation
with imagination. |
The reader has to dig for meaning; the writer does not use vivid words to get across the idea and fails to use imagery
or poetic devices to "show" the reader. |
Conventions |
Error free. The writer demonstrates sophisticated use of conventions. |
Almost a perfect paper with few errors. |
Mistakes sometimes distract the reader. |
Mistakes are abundant and impede meaningful reading. No evidence of proofreading. |